Open PeterHjortLauritzen opened 1 month ago
@PeterHjortLauritzen do you want me to setup this run? f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104 with the tuning as described?
That would be great. Thanks!
@JulioTBacmeister @PeterHjortLauritzen @adamrher @tilmes: Do we want also a FMT equivalent of coupled run 104 WITHOUT the "jet tuning ?
Re-reading the instructions, I see that it said that Simone is going to run the FMT equivalent of coupled run 104 WITHOUT the "jet tuning ? Is it correct @tilmes?
PS: I could do both or one. I just need to clarify.
Yes, I can start both once, from 1995-2014 if that is fine!
I have two runs for 12 years: 1995-2007: Without the jet tuning: Case: /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104 Output: /glade/derecho/scratch/tilmes/archive/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104/atm/hist
with jet tuning: Case: /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104.jet_tuning Output: /glade/derecho/scratch/tilmes/archive/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104.jet_tuning
@islasimpson could you redo the diagnostics with those?
Purpose of the run
In coupled run 104 we have positive biases in both the NH and SH Polar night jets. @JulioTBacmeister recommended the following tuning:
We don't have a FMT equivalent of coupled run 104 (baseline) but I think @tilmes will run that ...
Description of the run
See purpose of the run
Suffix in the casename
Suffix
Namelist modifications
effgw_rdg_beta = 1.0D0 effgw_rdg_beta_max = 1.0D0 alpha_gw_movmtn = 0.02d0
Source modifications
SourceMods
Sandbox
Requested sandbox or tag
Contact info
@JulioTBacmeister @cecilehannay @adamrher @tilmes
Any other relevant information
Enter relevant info