GW-tuning for FMT

[JulioTBacmeister]

Purpose of the run

New tuning run to follow up on #586. Reduces effgw_rdg back to 0.5. Retains alpha_gw_movmtn=0.02 Also throwing in change to effgw_beres to see if QBO period can be slowed down a bit

Description of the run

see purpose

Suffix in the casename

Suffix

Namelist modifications

effgw_rdg_beta = 0.5D0 (default) effgw_rdg_beta_max = 0.5D0 (default)

alpha_gw_movmtn = 0.02d0 (from 0.01d0)

effgw_beres_dp = 0.50D0 (from 0.07d0)

Source modifications

SourceMods

Sandbox

Requested sandbox or tag

Contact info

@JulioTBacmeister @cecilehannay @adamrher @tilmes @

Any other relevant information

Enter relevant info

[tilmes]

The run has been completed for the years 1995-2006 CaseDir: /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104.jet_tuning2 Output: /glade/derecho/scratch/tilmes/archive/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104.jet_tuning2 I am going to ask Justin to add the diagnostics. Simone

[JulioTBacmeister]

Thanks Simone!

[tilmes]

@JulioTBacmeister the diagnostics are here: https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/FMTHIST/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104.jet_tuning2/atm/f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104.jet_tuning2_1995_2006_vs_f.e30_beta02.FMTHIST.ne30.104_1995_2006/index.html

Looks better to me regarding the winds, but the QBO did not work well I think:

[tilmes]

@JulioTBacmeister The value for effgw_beres_dp I set to 0.07, that is what I read from the bracket, but I should have used 0.5 :)

[JulioTBacmeister]

@JulioTBacmeister The value for effgw_beres_dp I set to 0.07, that is what I read from the bracket, but I should have used 0.5 :)

Simone, Sorry for the confusion ... the bracket value was a typo. Let me try effgw_beres_dp=0.4 in FMTHIST, and see where that puts us.