Closed lisa-bengtsson closed 2 years ago
@lisa-bengtsson I strongly suggest to include "advfac" in both deep and shallow convection schemes, i.e., if(progsigma)then xmb(i) = sigmab(i)((-1.0omegac(i))/grav) => if(progsigma)then xmb(i) = advfac(i)sigmab(i)((-1.0*omegac(i))/grav)
The impact of "advfac" becomes significant in strong wind conditions such as in hurricane and more significant in higher resolution. As I presented in the convection meeting, without "advfac" term you would have a serious degrade in hurricane forecast (especially intensity) in both GFS and HAFS.
Ok, I can add this. We should do some tests on hurricane forecasts with and without this term for the sigmab closure as well. Thanks.
This PR introduces an optional closure assumption to the Arakawa-Schubert cloud work function in saSAS cumulus convection, as well as in the GFS shallow convection scheme in where the mass-flux at cloud base is described as the product between updraft area fraction and updraft velocity. The updraft area fraction is given by a prognostic moisture budget equation.
The update is not aimed for UFS coupled prototype 8, but is an option to be explored beyond P8.
In addition to updates in the ccpp/physics submodule, new field_table, and namelist parameters are added in ufs-weather-model.
Issue: https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-physics/issues/890 Dependency: https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/fv3atm/pull/523