Closed jwolff-ncar closed 4 years ago
@JohnHalleyGotway I am getting an error message when I try to compile MET.
Here is my error message: Downloading met-8.1.2 from https://dtcenter.org/sites/default/files/met-8.1.2.20191031.tar.gz % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 18716 0 18716 0 0 80423 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 80672
gzip: stdin: not in gzip format tar: Child returned status 1 tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now The command '/bin/sh -c umask 0002 && echo "Downloading met-${MET_VERSION} from ${MET_URL}" && mkdir -p /comsoftware/met && curl -SL ${MET_URL} | tar zxC /comsoftware/met && cd /comsoftware/met/met-${MET_VERSION} && LOG_FILE=/comsoftware/met/met-${MET_VERSION}/configure.log && echo "Configuring met-${MET_VERSION} and writing log file ${LOG_FILE}" && ./configure --prefix=/comsoftware/met/ --enable-grib2 --enable-mode_graphics --enable-modis --enable-lidar2nc --enable-python MET_NETCDF=/comsoftware/libs/netcdf MET_HDF=/comsoftware/libs/HDF4.2r3 MET_HDFEOS=/comsoftware/libs/hdfeos MET_FREETYPEINC=/usr/include/freetype2 MET_FREETYPELIB=/usr/lib MET_CAIROINC=/usr/include/cairo MET_CAIROLIB=/usr/lib MET_PYTHON_CC='-I/usr/include/python2.7' MET_PYTHON_LD='-lpython2.7' > ${LOG_FILE} && LOG_FILE=/comsoftware/met/met-${MET_VERSION}/make_install.log && echo "Compiling met-${MET_VERSION} and writing log file ${LOG_FILE}" && make install > ${LOG_FILE} && LOG_FILE=/comsoftware/met/met-${MET_VERSION}/make_test.log && echo "Testing met-${MET_VERSION} and writing log file ${LOG_FILE}" && make test > ${LOG_FILE} 2>&1' returned a non-zero code: 2
I was having space and memory issues earlier so it could just be my machine acting up. However, can you try the following?
git clone https://github.com/NCAR/container-dtc-nwp ${PROJ_DIR}/container-dtc-nwp cd container-dtc-nwp cd ${PROJ_DIR}/container-dtc-nwp/components cd met/MET ; docker build -t dtc-met . ; cd ../..
@JohnHalleyGotway Oops, obviously a bad path to the tar file. Just need to find the right one. Looking now but if you can point me to it that would be great. Thanks!
@JohnHalleyGotway I updated the Dockerfile path to the MET 8.1.2 tarball and now it compiles.
I ran into an issue with METviewer. Suggestions? @TatianaBurek
git clone https://github.com/NCAR/container-dtc-nwp ${PROJ_DIR}/container-dtc-nwp cd container-dtc-nwp cd ${PROJ_DIR}/container-dtc-nwp/components cd metviewer/METviewer ; docker build -t dtc-metviewer . ; cd ../..
Error: Problem: package R-3.6.1-1.el8.x86_64 requires R-devel = 3.6.1-1.el8, but none of the providers can be installed
I added NCL to DockerHub: From: /Volumes/d1/jwolff/projects/AWS/sc_test_20191219/container-dtc-nwp/components/ncl
docker build -t dtcenter/ncl .
docker push dtcenter/ncl
Note: Should connect this to the repo so if the Dockerfile changes it is updated automatically
docker pull dtcenter/ncl
To get METviewer to build, the DTC base image needed to be modified to use centos:7 (rather than latest). Once this was done, it built fine.
Just as a note, if updating the WRF_VERSION it needs to be done in multiple places: components/wps_wrf/Dockerfile components/scripts/case/set_env.ksh If this is not done correctly it will crash at runtime.
The latest prebuilt images have been uploaded to Drupal.
This is done.
Update prebuilt images (hasn't been done in awhile!).
@jwolff-ncar Will do this on my laptop and then copy the saved images over to mohawk:/d2/www/dtcenter/container_nwp_tutorial/tar_files/prebuilt_images
We really want to use the save images on DockerHub: docker pull dtcenter/gsi docker pull dtcenter/wps_wrf docker pull dtcenter/upp docker pull dtcenter/met
@mkavulich Can you add NCL to this list? And does it also make sense to include the data containers? @JohnHalleyGotway Is that the right MET we should be pointing to (confirming it shouldn't be met-dev)? @jwolff-ncar and @michelleharrold Michelle and I discussed this the other day. There are currently 3 Dockerfiles for MET floating around: MET repo itself, container-dtc-met, and container-dtc-nwp. After the met-9.0 release, I think we should delete the container-dtc-met repo entirely. And then repoint the DockerHub reference to the MET repo itself. Hopefully that’ll simplify things.
We need METviewer too.