Closed mgalloy closed 4 years ago
@jburkepile says:
The 20200417 data from the raw.fill directory are rotated slightly compared with the data on the archive from the production pipeline. The fill data are rotated a fraction of a degree in the clockwise direction.
For some unknown reason, the roll correction seems to 0.0 when using bilinear interpolation for the rotations using ROT
. Why is this? Should the roll correction be changed to 0.0?
Can we use the Venus transit to pin down solar north?
@jburkepile is going to create a composite that will specify a new roll correction.
@jburkepile email:
Don made composite images of Kcor and AIA for Sept 10, 2017 with the sharp ray. The K-Cor images are processed with bilinear interpolation for rotation. It looks like 0.7 degrees (which is our current correction) is still (arguably) the best. I asked him to make very fine rotation changes, zero to 0.7 degrees in 0.1 degree increments. It is hard to see much difference between adjacent rolls but there is a clear difference between 0. and 0.7. I put the data on the shared MLSO folder:
- Path: Mauna Loa Solar Observatory / K-Cor / KCOR roll correction / Bi-linear interpolation in processing /
I need to pick other days for composites to verify this. Mike ... I will ask you to process those days with bi-linear interpolation once I have a short list.
There is now an option to choose between bilinear and cubic for interpolations,
realtime/cubic
. Determine the best interpolation method to use for each interpolation done in the pipeline:KCOR_FSHIFT
(bilinear)To make the gain cause less of a cliff between inside/outside of the occulter, do: