Reprocess test dates

[mgalloy]

Things to check:

• [x] rest wavelength looks reasonable
• [x] line width display, especially for 706 nm

Dates:

• [x] 20210601
• [x] 20210701
• [x] 20210801
• [x] 20210828
• [x] 20210924
• [x] 20211002
• [x] 20211120
• [x] 20211212
• [x] 20220111
• [x] 20220225
• [x] 20220331
• [x] 20220413
• [x] 20220504
• [x] 20220612
• [x] 20220728
• [x] 20220825
• [x] 20220901
• [x] 20220914
• [x] 20220930
• [x] 20221026
• [x] 20221120

Test 2:

• [x] 20211120
• [x] 20220111
• [x] 20220504
• [x] 20220612

Test 3:

Rest wavelength computation done for 1074 by improved POLY_FIT linear model.

• [x] 20210828
• [x] 20211120
• [x] 20220111
• [x] 20220504
• [x] 20220612
• [x] 20221026

Test 4:

Rest wavelength computation done for 1074 by improved POLY_FIT quadratic model. 1074 only.

• [x] 20210828
• [x] 20211120
• [x] 20220111
• [x] 20220504
• [x] 20220612
• [x] 20221026

Test 5:

Rest wavelength computation done for 1074 by individual data file method. 1074 only.

• [x] 20210828
• [x] 20211120

Test 6:

Tweaks to constants and bug fix.

• [x] 20210828
• [x] 20210924
• [x] 20211120
• [x] 20220111
• [x] 20220504
• [x] 20220612
• [x] 20221026

Test 7:

Same as 6 except only 1074 nm and using image data for rest wavelength calculation instead of the model.

• [x] 20210828
• [x] 20210924
• [x] 20211120
• [x] 20220111
• [x] 20220504
• [x] 20220612
• [x] 20221026

Test 8:

Over mask occulter for rest wavelength calculation by 8 pixels. Use image data for rest wavelength calculation for 1074 nm. 789 nm enhanced intensity image display fix.

• [x] 20210828
• [x] 20210924
• [x] 20211120
• [x] 20220111
• [x] 20220504
• [x] 20220612
• [x] 20221026

Test 9:

Test display 706 nm IQUV all images and new mechanism to add user guide to tarballs.

• [x] 20220504

[mgalloy]

In #175, @detoma suggests using the following days for testing the rest wavelength computation, so they would most likely be good for this issue as well:

• 20210828
• 20210924
• 20211120
• 20220111
• 20220225
• 20220331
• 20220413
• 20220612
• 20220728
• 20220825
• 20220901
• 20220914
• 20220930
• 20221026

[mgalloy]

Results are in process.commissioning-test.

[detoma]

The new color table for the FWHM does not work. It is basically all the same color at the low and high end. We need a color table with more variation.

Velocity .png do not look good. Are we sure we apply the correct rest-wavelength? If so, the median rest wavelength from file should be very close to the number we applied from the fit.

Another thing I noticed about the velocity is that we extend too far in the fov. We are including bad pixels that should be masked. That is easy to fix.

[mgalloy]

Sorry, wrong issue.