When we pull in GWAS catalog, we get EFO terms. If one of these doesn't synonymize to either a mondo or an HP, we don't assign it a subclass, and just leave it as the union class. It's not completely wrong, but maybe not as useful as it could be? To be addressed in upcoming type inference refactor.
When we pull in GWAS catalog, we get EFO terms. If one of these doesn't synonymize to either a mondo or an HP, we don't assign it a subclass, and just leave it as the union class. It's not completely wrong, but maybe not as useful as it could be? To be addressed in upcoming type inference refactor.