Closed kadelakun closed 3 years ago
What is the Translator product?
Domains • Target landscape • Drug repurposing • [Redefining disease]
Questions • Explain • Predict
Results • Establish user trust by finding ground truths • Surface novel associations
Boxed warning: agitation, aggressive behavior, anxiety, irritability, difficulty paying attention, memory loss or forgetfulness, confusion, unusual dreams, hallucinations (seeing things or hearing voices that do not exist), repeating thoughts that you cannot control, depression, difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep, restlessness, sleep walking, suicidal thoughts or actions (thinking about harming or killing yourself or planning or trying to do so), or tremor (uncontrollable shaking of a part of the body)
COHD: 35,000 unique patients with prescriptions for montelukast in 5-year cohort 5,364,781 (https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata2018273)
ICEES:
Unique patients who received at least one prescription for montelukast, per year
Year Count 2014 960 2015 279 2016 2146 2017 3602 2018 1862 2019 4344
Overall Total: 11612 unique patients received at least one prescription for montelukast, 2014-2019
[Provided here largely for reference]
These aren't challenges themselves, but I have some thoughts on how COHD could be useful in various challenges, such as drug repurposing questions. In general, I prefer the COHD associations to not be used as independent hops within a query graph to find potential answers, but rather use the COHD associations to help rank potential answers found by an ARA through some other query. This can be thought of as a parallel path to the answer node in a knowledge graph. A few suggestions on how this can be used (the bold sections indicate which parts COHD may be able to contribute to):
Given a target condition and candidate drugs found by an ARA for repurposing:
Note: A significant association found in COHD could be used to help rank answers, but the lack of a returned association edge does not indicate that an association does not exist.
Additional suggestions from Exposures Provider:
These overlap with some of the above, with different wording that might work around some current limitations in the integrated ARS, ARA. KP system. Simple: What diseases are associated with patients on montelukast? Simple: What diseases are predictive of being treated with montelukast? Simple: What drugs are predictive of being treated with montelukast? Simple: What drugs are prescribed after being treated with montelukast? Simple: What drugs are disproportionate prescribed after being treated with montelukast? More interesting: What mechanisms/drugs/genes might connect montelukast with drugs that are disproportionately prescribed after being treated with montelukast? More interesting: What mechanisms/drugs/genes might connect montelukast with phenothypes that are disproportionately diagnosed after being treated with montelukast? More interesting: Connecting above with depression.
(Also see this doc)
acanthosis nigricans: Patient presented with acanthosis nigricans. Genomic sequencing revealed variants in multiple genes. Causal variant was a gain of function in EGFR. MediKanren recommended erlotinib. We compounded it as a topical cream with a specialist pharmacy, and the patient applied to one arm, but not the other. Significant reduction in the skin growths occurred on the treated arm.
severe ataxic episodes: Patient presented with ataxic episodes. Genomic sequencing revealed multiple variants. Causal variant was a missense mutation in the domain controlling degradation of RHOBTB2, hence making it a gain of function in RHOBTB2. No direct RHOBTB2 inhibitors are known to exist, but several indirector downregulators of RHOBTB2 (via E2F1) do exist, and celecoxib showed a substantial reduction in ataxic episodes.
extreme developmental delay; non-ambulatory at age 5: Patient presented with multiple VUSes. Causal variant was determined to be in MAPK8IP3, leading to predicted haploinsufficiency. Retinoic acid is a potent upregulator of MAPK8IP3. 6 months of treatment with vitamin A lead to patient standing and taking simple steps. 18 months of treatments led to patient walking freely under own power and notable cognitive gains.
*Please see #4.
Prior to the breast cancer use case, we had considered a DILI use case. At the time, Multi-omics EHR Provider and Clinical Data Provider were capable of answering questions related to DILI, but Exposures Provider was only semi-capable, as we had not yet stood-up our planned ICEES+ DILI instance. We were going to move forward regardless until we realized that a breast cancer use case was something that all of the clinical KPs (including Connections Hypothesis Provider) could contribute to.
However, Exposures Provider received an Augmentin DILI dataset from the international DILIN network just this past Tuesday, 3/16/2021. We should be able to expose the data via ICEES+ fairly quickly. As such, I'm inclined to rethink this use case.
Thoughts from others?
The purpose of this issue is to brainstorm regarding the next clinical data use case "challenge" question.