Open gglusman opened 10 months ago
from TAQA: for MVP1 - "tobacco smoke should never be a treatment" -- Tyler. @webyrd - is it possible that this can be blocked on an ARA basis, or is this feasible albeit a bit odd?
Perhaps I should have been more explicit about it, but to me the main issue here is the reasoning. A affects B associated_with C hardly equates to A treats C. Even A may_treat C is unwarranted, since the evidence for that isn't any stronger than the evidence for the opposite direction (e.g., A causes C, or A exacerbates C).
"tobacco smoke pollution" has been added to the result blocked list of Unsecret. This answer has been removed from the CI, TEST, and PROD environments. A view in UI PROD: https://ui.transltr.io/main/results?l=Alzheimer%20Disease&i=MONDO:0004975&t=0&r=0&q=8034d934-4f0c-4f33-9cc4-004bb3869788
https://ui.test.transltr.io/main/results?l=Alzheimer+Disease&i=MONDO%3A0004975&t=0&r=ed9a439c&q=90ef5948-3fed-4641-ba99-6a566cec01aa
Direct path shows Unsecret as Knowledge Source. Two-hop path offers pollution as a treatment for AD since the pollution affects a gene that is associated with the disease. Both edges are at face value very weak, so it's surprising for their combination to score 4.54/5.00, lacking information about directionality.
There's literature support for tobacco smoke pollution activating ATF3, and ATF3 activation mediating AD.