@mbjones Here's a mapping with all codemeta terms on the left and matching eml terms on the right; so null indicates what we're lacking in EML. At first pass, I think the EML terms are sufficient for a reasonably good description that would be straight-forward to automatically map.
I can try an R implementation for creating eml-software from codemeta.json for a real test.
@mbjones Here's a mapping with all codemeta terms on the left and matching eml terms on the right; so
null
indicates what we're lacking in EML. At first pass, I think the EML terms are sufficient for a reasonably good description that would be straight-forward to automatically map.I can try an R implementation for creating
eml-software
fromcodemeta.json
for a real test.