Add support for ADC Disciplines in the editor for arctic theme

[amoeba]

We built out the ADC Disciplines ontology for classifying datasets in the Arctic Data Center into their associated discipline(s) but it's not fully supported in the editor. Right now, scientists don't choose their own discipline(s) and the datateam ends up guessing and assigning for them. Supporting this directly in the editor would allow scientists to choose their discipline(s) which would increase the accuracy of choices and save the data team time.

You can see an example of a dataset that has been classified at Karen Beard and Ryan Choi. 2017. Plant community response to warming and herbivory on sub-arctic coastal terraces in Western Alaska, 2015 - 2016. Arctic Data Center. urn:uuid:c02224c6-5883-4741-ace6-c26267e72e95..

Each choice for discipline is serialized as a dataset-level annotation,

<dataset ...>
    ...
    <annotation>
      <propertyURI label="theme">http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#theme</propertyURI>
      <valueURI label="Plant Science">https://purl.dataone.org/odo/ADCAD_00021</valueURI>
    </annotation>
    ...
</dataset>

and multiple are allowed. I think much of the implementation can be copied from either the Measurement Type code or @laurenwalker's more recent data sensitivity classification work so this shouldn't be a ton of work.

• [ ] Get consensus on how this will look/behave and where it will go in the editor
• [ ] Implement and test it

[amoeba]

I'm thinking something that looks and behaves pretty similarly to how we did the MeasurementType implementation in the attribute editor would work here, like:

As for location, I think we generally agreed to put it near the Title section.

Two questions came up right away:

1. Could we pre-expand some of the tree.

   

   By default, the tree widget only shows the top level term but I think something like automatically expanding the top level term might work better.

2. Do we want to let the user pick non-leaf nodes? ie should a person be allowed to pick "Natural Science"?

[mbjones]

I think ideally we want people to pick nodes that are as specific as possible -- so generally leaf nodes, but not necessarily always when there is a little hierarchy (e.g., in the geosciences, or political science). In general I think Natural Science is too high level and it would be best to get more specific choices. If the person doesn't find something more specific than that, it argues that we are probably missing some critical subdisciplines, and those should be added.

[amoeba]

Since the ADC is moderated and we're only enabling this there, it sounds like allowing any choice and also offering a "I couldn't find a suitable term" check box like we did with the Measurement Type implementation would work.

[mbjones]

That sounds good. I wonder if there is a way to provide configuration options for "Only allow choices "below level 2" or "only allow leaf nodes"? If that is complicated, then just allowing any selection and falling back on curation is fine.

[amoeba]

Might not be too bad to implement. I'll have a look.

[robyngit]

• Repositories should be able to configure an ontology (not just ADC Disciplines)