In spatialReference.xsd and spatialRaster.xsd the use of units is inconsistent. eml-spatialReference.xsd defines 2 types which are lists of units, very similar to what is going on in the attribute and coverage schemas (see bug #1019 comment #4).
and
each of which is an enumeration that includes a group units which are also in standardUnits, but as implied by the names, their lists are units of type length and angle, respectively. The types are used inconsistently:
eml-spatialReference.xsd:2215:
eml-spatialReference.xsd:2273:
eml-spatialReference.xsd:2386:
eml-spatialReference.xsd:2396:
eml-spatialReference.xsd:2499:
eml-spatialReference.xsd:2508:
eml-spatialRaster.xsd 793:
Author Name: Margaret O'Brien (Margaret O'Brien) Original Redmine Issue: 3523, https://projects.ecoinformatics.org/ecoinfo/issues/3523 Original Date: 2008-10-09 Original Assignee: Matt Jones
In spatialReference.xsd and spatialRaster.xsd the use of units is inconsistent. eml-spatialReference.xsd defines 2 types which are lists of units, very similar to what is going on in the attribute and coverage schemas (see bug #1019 comment #4).