Replaced taxonomy Rule 10, which appears to violate our intention to decouple the taxon name from the measurement process. It also leaves some situations unclear as to whether to use a parameter or add a token.
The optimal differentiation probably requires some fundamental modeling thought to definitively answer.
Potential differentiating criteria in the meantime: Likelihood of additional parameter values in the future--maybe Parameters for numeric input and influence quantity values only--no Required-parameter set--yes, drafted accordingly
We should examine examples to break, refine or support this rule.
I didn't restore the [ParameterRule] label but it appears the rst file lacks some label work throughout.
Replaced taxonomy Rule 10, which appears to violate our intention to decouple the taxon name from the measurement process. It also leaves some situations unclear as to whether to use a parameter or add a token.
The optimal differentiation probably requires some fundamental modeling thought to definitively answer.
Potential differentiating criteria in the meantime: Likelihood of additional parameter values in the future--maybe Parameters for numeric input and influence quantity values only--no Required-parameter set--yes, drafted accordingly
We should examine examples to break, refine or support this rule.
I didn't restore the [ParameterRule] label but it appears the rst file lacks some label work throughout.