anardek
commented
1 year ago That’s great Thomas! So glad to hear it was useful. I recall Casey wanting the inlet hydrodynamics to be resolved by ADCIRC, and the BC inside the intracoastal. I think I would like to know more about the justification for changing the BC to a long shore parallel BC.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 2:05 AM Thomas Thelen @.***> wrote:
Hai @caseydietrich https://github.com/caseydietrich and @anardek https://github.com/anardek here is an update from my week in 3Di country:
The training was very useful. I feel much more confident in my understanding of model physics and setup. Thanks to the training and helpful colleagues, I made more model development progress in the last 3 days than I did in the two months of working on my own.
The latest version of the model that I have set up is snipped below. The boundaries circled in red are water level boundary conditions. Per Dr. Volp's recommendation, we are now including the tidal inlet in the model so there is no artificial disconnect between the ocean and the intracoastal. There are some additional options that Dr. Volp suggested if we think we need to tweak these BC further for a better representation (discharge BC in Snow's Cut and a shore parallel BC along the ocean), but I want to review the first round of results before doing that extra work. I also have only setup the drain network at one of the Canal Drive intersections so far. Adding in the rest of the sewer system is probably my next step.
[image: Image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/89156971/205320398-61c0449b-dc71-4d94-ac5a-81dba5ed75d7.png
Overall, I am quite happy with where the model is at. The version I have right now runs a 10 day simulation in about an hour and (from the eye test) seems to be a reasonable representation of flooding on Canal. A closer inspection of water level results in the coming weeks will allow me to put some numbers to this assessment. If there are any specifics from this week that you would like me to cover at our next check-in meeting, please let me know.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NCSU-CHAZ/Sunny-Day-Flooding/issues/22#issuecomment-1335383652, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANXYL52H4YZNQ5EYTUNR67LWLIF4VANCNFSM6AAAAAASR7ZDJM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
ththelen
Zoomed in 
Full domain
Hai @caseydietrich and @anardek here is an update from my week in 3Di country:
The training was very useful. I feel much more confident in my understanding of model physics and setup. Thanks to the training and helpful colleagues, I made more model development progress in the last 3 days than I did in the two months of working on my own.
The latest version of the model that I have set up is snipped below. The boundaries circled in red are water level boundary conditions. Per Dr. Volp's recommendation, we are now including the tidal inlet in the model so there is no artificial disconnect between the ocean and the intracoastal. There are some additional options that Dr. Volp suggested if we think we need to tweak these BC further for a better representation (discharge BC in Snow's Cut and a shore parallel BC along the ocean), but I want to review the first round of results before doing that extra work. I also have only setup the drain network at one of the Canal Drive intersections so far. Adding in the rest of the sewer system is probably my next step.
Overall, I am quite happy with where the model is at. The version I have right now runs a 10 day simulation in about an hour and (from the eye test) seems to be a reasonable representation of flooding on Canal. A closer inspection of water level results in the coming weeks will allow me to put some numbers to this assessment. If there are any specifics from this week that you would like me to cover at our next check-in meeting, please let me know.