Finalize figures for Drivers paper

[ththelen]

Thread to discuss drivers paper figures

[ththelen]

@anardek @caseydietrich at long last, I have a draft set of Drivers paper figures and tables to share. The PowerPoint slide available at this Googe Drive link contains all the draft section headings, subheadings, figures, tables, and captions that I plan to include in the Drivers paper. The section headings are included to give you a sense for how the tables and figures fit in the narrative flow. Note that some of the figures and tables may be low resolution because I have snipped them from a Google Doc or somewhere else. These items will be higher resolution in the final iteration.

There is a lot of content in this slide deck, much of it being content that you have not seen before. I think it may too much to discuss in one meeting. Perhaps it would be better to have your two review and comment on the slides first, then meet to discuss once I have had a chance to review your comments? Let me know what your thoughts are on the best way to review.

Now that the narrative and draft figures are taking shape, I think it might also be a good time to circle back to our discussion of what journal we should target for publication. We discussed this topic way back in the spring, but tabled the discussion until we had a better sense for what the paper would look like. It would be nice to know what journal format I should be targeting as I now finalize figures, formatting, narrative, etc.

I look forward to receiving your feedback on the figures!

[anardek]

That sounds like a good plan. I'll review next week and then lets schedule a time to meet.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 12:36 PM Thomas Thelen @.***> wrote:

@anardek https://github.com/anardek @caseydietrich https://github.com/caseydietrich at long last, I have a draft set of Drivers paper figures and tables to share. The PowerPoint slide available at this Googe Drive link https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Xz3-udleOrGq2EITCfPuxjKG18VGCSlx/edit?usp=share_link&ouid=100107816394245514762&rtpof=true&sd=true contains all the draft section headings, subheadings, figures, tables, and captions that I plan to include in the Drivers paper. The section headings are included to give you a sense for how the tables and figures fit in the narrative flow. Note that some of the figures and tables may be low resolution because I have snipped them from a Google Doc or somewhere else. These items will be higher resolution in the final iteration.

There is a lot of content in this slide deck, much of it being content that you have not seen before. I think it may too much to discuss in one meeting. Perhaps it would be better to have your two review and comment on the slides first, then meet to discuss once I have had a chance to review your comments? Let me know what your thoughts are on the best way to review.

Now that the narrative and draft figures are taking shape, I think it might also be a good time to circle back to our discussion of what journal we should target for publication. We discussed this topic way back in the spring, but tabled the discussion until we had a better sense for what the paper would look like. It would be nice to know what journal format I should be targeting as I now finalize figures, formatting, narrative, etc.

I look forward to receiving your feedback on the figures!

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NCSU-CHAZ/Sunny-Day-Flooding/issues/28#issuecomment-1768929885, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANXYL54MA3PMEE2CZSQHRT3YAAAPVAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6FZP56CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONRYHEZDSOBYGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[ththelen]

Journal options:

• Water Resources Research
• Water Research: published studies on NYC flood sensors, Chesapeake Bay tidal flooding WQ sampling and modeling
• Natural Hazards

[ththelen]

Hi @anardek and @caseydietrich, I am circling back to this thread to see what the timeline for figure review and discussion might look like. I completely understand if the disruptions that came up this week mean that you all will have to push back your timeline for reviewing past what we originally discussed. Just let me know what you think is a reasonable timeline for review and discussion, and I will plan around that.

[anardek]

Thomas, I reviewed and added comments. @caseydietrich - can you take a look?

[anardek]

Also, I vote for Water or WRR. Lets try Water first.

[caseydietrich]

@ththelen I reviewed and added comments. I'm not familiar with Water Research, but if they have published similar papers, then I agree it is a good target. (cc: @anardek )