What is the enhancement request for the cPP? Please describe.
APE_CCL.1-15 in CC:2022 states the following: “The evaluator shall examine the PP to determine that the statement of security requirements is consistent with all security requirements stated in the PPs and any functional packages to which conformance is being claimed, taking into consideration the conformance statements of PPs to which conformance is being claimed.”
To conform to this workunit, it is believed to be necessary for section 6.2 of the NDcPP to reference FCS_SSH_EXT.1, FCS_SSHC_EXT.1, and FCS_SSHS_EXT.1 since the PP claims conformance to the SSH Package.
Describe the solution you'd like
Recommendation would be to update the “protocols” text in Figure 16 to reference these SFRs, with a citation that they are from the SSH Functional Package if desired.
Describe alternatives you've considered
This appears to be the easiest solution to ensure that the PP conforms to CC:2022.
Additional context
NIAP requested review of PP/SD against CC:2022 and for us to provide guidance and recommendations on changes that will be needed for compatibility with the updated version of the CC.
Provide the location of the issue PP section 6.2
What is the enhancement request for the cPP? Please describe. APE_CCL.1-15 in CC:2022 states the following: “The evaluator shall examine the PP to determine that the statement of security requirements is consistent with all security requirements stated in the PPs and any functional packages to which conformance is being claimed, taking into consideration the conformance statements of PPs to which conformance is being claimed.” To conform to this workunit, it is believed to be necessary for section 6.2 of the NDcPP to reference FCS_SSH_EXT.1, FCS_SSHC_EXT.1, and FCS_SSHS_EXT.1 since the PP claims conformance to the SSH Package.
Describe the solution you'd like Recommendation would be to update the “protocols” text in Figure 16 to reference these SFRs, with a citation that they are from the SSH Functional Package if desired.
Describe alternatives you've considered This appears to be the easiest solution to ensure that the PP conforms to CC:2022.
Additional context NIAP requested review of PP/SD against CC:2022 and for us to provide guidance and recommendations on changes that will be needed for compatibility with the updated version of the CC.