Closed jessb0t closed 2 years ago
Some questions @jessb0t
proj_redcap.csv
)instruments
, correct?@F-said
Yes, the CSVs do have a standardized name. It begins with a truncated version of the REDCap project (and we make new REDCap projects for the same study when we make major modifications to the questionnaires that participants answer). For instance, here is Social Context:
The standardized naming (direct from REDCap) also includes the export date. I do not know what the four number at the end represent.
Yes, older files will persist (see screenshot above). For now, I believe we have decided to live with all the duplication in order to avoid any risk of losing data. But would love to brainstorm future solutions that would make this all "cleaner."
No, output CSVs should be placed in the derivatives/preprocessed
folder. In effect, we are running the "instruments" script on the checked
files of a particular study/folder structure and outputting the results to the preprocessed
folder dedicated to that study.
Pulls input from:
checked
Outputs to:preprocessed
Script checks for any newer version of the REDCap export .csv file. If found, runs that file through the
instruments
scoring script.