search

NDCLab / lab-devOps

NDCLab mgmt and operations
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

g-drive-create template structure for study folders #38

Closed jessb0t closed 3 years ago

jessb0t commented 3 years ago

DONE Defined:

  1. Establish default template for new research study (based on current paradigm).
  2. Clean up existing studies (SC001, ML001, RWE001).
jessb0t commented 3 years ago

@georgebuzzell I'd like to clean up the current Google Drive starting with the three studies that we are currently launching. I can see that your original template concept was: Code Issues Literature Notes Roadmap

I believe that GitHub has replaced the need for many of these (code, issues, notes, roadmap) to live on Google Drive, so I am proposing: 01_design (working space for things like the text stimuli collaboration on RWE001) 02_protocols (self-explanatory) 03_IRB (all submitted IRBs, all notes for future submissions, informed consents released by IRB) 04_training (working space for training RAs, such as sign-ups for rehearsals, etc.)

I have an open question on whether questionnaires should be included per study. If so, those would be #3 in the folder structure.

Attached is an overview of the three projects-in-progress and my notes. For places I have said "Delete all," I would put these in a temporary "recycling bin" for us to review before any permanent deletion. Just "removing" from the active project folder to begin the organizational process. Please let me know your thoughts.

Screen Shot 2021-05-17 at 13.16.19.png

georgebuzzell commented 3 years ago

@jessb0t as always, this is FANTASTIC! Responses and comments:

Yes, I totally agree with the new template folders being: design, protocols, irb, training. And moving the rest into a recycling bin for now. Please note, that some items may be mis-sorted currently (i.e. a protocol in literature or something like that), so we will want to go through everything.

Yes, agree that code, issues, roadmap can all move to gh now. We will need to "dump" some things there to get started.

I agree that questionnaires should NOT live inside individual study folders. Instead, those should all go in the instruments repo you created. Then, each study would simply reference and point to the item in the instruments repo.

jessb0t commented 3 years ago

Suggestion for dataset: image.png

Suggestion for analysis: image.png

jessb0t commented 3 years ago

@georgebuzzell What do you think about the above proposal (posted 10/12, but I only tagged you now)?

georgebuzzell commented 3 years ago

in general, this seems to make sense to me. That said, I may not be thinking it through fully, and might realize down the line we need to change up a bit. But, if this seems like it will work on your end, then happy for us to move this way now, and then adjust as needed.

Thank you @jessb0t !