gh-cleanup existing repos

[jessb0t]

DONE Defined:

• All existing repos comply with naming conventions.
• Unnecessary repos are deleted.
• Team with push access for each repo defined and established.
• Change default privileges to "Read" for all members (how-to link).
• Main and dev branches protected by workflow.
• Clean readme and contributing files on main+dev for all repos.

[jessb0t]

Lab-wide repos (all lab members have read+ access, devOps=Admin): :white_check_mark: wiki (no dev, write access for labwide) :white_check_mark: brainBox (no dev, write access for labwide) :white_check_mark: instruments (write access for labwide) :white_check_mark: lab-matters (no dev, triage access for labwide) :white_check_mark: lab-training (no dev, triage access for labwide)

Code repos (create team with write access, establish one member with Maintainer access, all lab members have read access, devOps=Admin) :white_check_mark: pepper-pipeline (team=match Slack channel)

Project repos (create team with write access, establish one member with Maintainer access, all lab members have read access, devOps=Admin, protect main+dev) mind-reading (analysis) :white_check_mark: criticality (archived to ndclab-archive) adult-pre-post-theta (analysis, yanbin)

Template repos (all lab members have read access, devOps=Admin, no protection required) :white_check_mark: template-tool :white_check_mark: template-dataset :white_check_mark: template-analysis

labdevOps (all lab members have read access, devOps=Admin, protect main (no dev)) :white_check_mark: lab-devOps

Other gitting-thru-grad-school

[F-said]

@jessb0t Deleted ndclab.github.io, wiki is still up 😌

[F-said]

@jessb0t just to confirm, base-eeg currently has branch protection rules on the two branches specified

Also, I believe the python-tutorial repo was created as an introductory repo for new lab members to get acquainted with Python. Perhaps this can be fleshed out in the future and set up on the wiki page? At the same time, however, there are already some great online resources that we could point people to.

[jessb0t]

Thanks, @F-said!

• Deleted ndclab.github.io from original comment.
• Confirmed on baseEEG (was trying to make myself a list for future cross-check, but I realize that this implication was maybe that it still needed to be setup, oops!).
• Maybe it's just me, but that .ipynb file seems a bit intense for a beginner. I think it might be better to focus our attention on tools/training that we develop ourselves and teaching python might be a bit down the road. @georgebuzzell, let us know if you are ok with us removing that repo.

[jessb0t]

Updated first comment with these changes: baseEEG: renamed to pepper-pipeline tech: added to lab-wide repos psychopy: deleted from first comment as has been removed from GH EOCBpy: deleted from first comment as has been removed from GH adult-pre-post-theta: added to project repos template-research: split into template-dataset and template-analysis gitting-thru-grad-school: added to list

[jessb0t]

Deleted python-tutorials. Deleted meta-social-context. Deleted real-world-errors.

[jessb0t]

Propose closing this issue at this time. With the creation of many new repos recently, consistency efforts will be per-repo going forward, but the heavy-lifting on labwide consistency has been achieved.