Closed scanon closed 5 years ago
It would be nice to understand what things we expect following "application/json" in the content-type. We might want to dial it to specific conditions, rather than "application/json*", e.g., if there is format encodings or other information we might be able to make better use of that information (rather than effectively ignore it)
I think this is ready now
Coverage remained the same at 64.65% when pulling 4a0f25249ebc41d8a5870202e3bcb954b312c6e8 on scanon:issue258 into 69843f68ed2c4164ea8ae6b6d7266cc942e62628 on NERSC:master.