search

NESCent / hip_hack_howto

Hackathon guidance from NESCent's Hackathons, Interoperability, Phylogenies working group.
1 stars 1 forks source link

Create a shared mendeley library for relevant literature #2

Closed rvosa closed 9 years ago

rvosa commented 9 years ago

Right?

aidanbudd commented 9 years ago

Never used Mendeley before, if I've time I'll try this out, and/but if that's really quick/easy for you Rutger and you have the time, great if you set it up.

epontell commented 9 years ago

Is it still free of charge to create a Mendely community?

Enrico

From: aidanbudd Reply-To: arlin/hip_hack_howto Date: Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 2:21 AM To: arlin/hip_hack_howto Subject: Re: [hip_hack_howto] Create a shared mendeley library for relevant literature (#2)

Never used Mendeley before, if I've time I'll try this out, and/but if that's really quick/easy for you Rutger and you have the time, great if you set it up.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

rvosa commented 9 years ago

It is free of charge if it is an "open" group - which, for our purposes, should be fine. I created a group and invited Hilmar, Arlin and Karen, because they are the only participants to whom I am currently connected on Mendeley. Here is the group: http://www.mendeley.com/groups/6731181/hip-hack-howto/

hlapp commented 9 years ago

I was wondering whether we can't just do with a bibtex file in this repo.

rvosa commented 9 years ago

In 99 out of 100 cases I am also a big fan of plain text data but I really don't think this is practical for this case. While we're assembling the bibliography, wouldn't it be nice to just use the bookmarklet? And when we're cleaning things up, e.g. alternate author names, wouldn't it be nice to use the facilities in mendeley desktop for that? Also, the word plugin for mendeley has actually become usable. For the time being my vote is to use mendeley, but I am easily swayed by good arguments.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Hilmar Lapp notifications@github.com wrote:

I was wondering whether we can't just do with a bibtex files in this repo.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/arlin/hip_hack_howto/issues/2#issuecomment-76323240.

hlapp commented 9 years ago

I have no objections to Mendeley, I just don't use it anymore. However, it's easy enough to pull down stuff from there as Bibtex, so this question doesn't need to be about one or the other.

rvosa commented 9 years ago

Cool. If we're interested in pursuing the literature analysis idea than exporting to bibtex is likely a good idea anyway.

rvosa commented 9 years ago

I have added all the locatable references that are cited at the bottom of manuscript.md to the Mendeley library. At this point I suppose we could export this to BibTex or continue on with Mendeley, whatever the preference may be.

arlin commented 9 years ago

Thanks Rutger! I'm going to close this. Choosing the next step is a separate issue.