NESCent / popgenInfo

Vignettes for Population Genetics in R
http://popgen.nescent.org
MIT License
20 stars 50 forks source link

remove summary seq from menubar #178

Closed zkamvar closed 8 years ago

zkamvar commented 8 years ago

This will address #163

hlapp commented 8 years ago

I assume this is based on the assumption that #89 won't be addressed in a timely enough way? @mmlopezu, it seems you've taken on #89 - can you confirm that this won't be ready soon enough (this week) for submission?

Of course, in principle even if it does become ready in time, the menu item could just be added again in #89. (Though once I merge this, adding it back in in #89 will create a merge conflict.)

mmlopezu commented 8 years ago

Hilmar - I am very sorry but it will not be ready this week. I'll work on it after April 1st.

Margarita

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Hilmar Lapp notifications@github.com wrote:

I assume this is based on the assumption that #89 https://github.com/NESCent/popgenInfo/issues/89 won't be addressed in a timely enough way? @mmlopezu https://github.com/mmlopezu, it seems you've taken on #89 https://github.com/NESCent/popgenInfo/issues/89 - can you confirm that this won't be ready soon enough (this week) for submission?

Of course, in principle even if it does become ready in time, the menu item could just be added again in #89 https://github.com/NESCent/popgenInfo/issues/89. (Though once I merge this, adding it back in in #89 https://github.com/NESCent/popgenInfo/issues/89 will create a merge conflict.)

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/NESCent/popgenInfo/pull/178#issuecomment-200541002

Margarita M. López-Uribe NSF Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Entomology and Department of Applied Ecology North Carolina State University https://sites.google.com/a/cornell.edu/mm-lopez-uribe/ https://sites.google.com/a/cornell.edu/margarita-m-lopez-uribe/

hlapp commented 8 years ago

No worries, @mmlopezu. Just wanted to confirm with you that we're not making incorrect assumptions.