Open acjay opened 9 years ago
Makes sense. I can add a overloaded version of ?
and &
.
I need to revisit this. I think I need to audit all the parameter and return types and make sure they are sensible.
There was a recent twitter conversation about this where the consensus for return types was that they should be as specific as possible. There were mixed views on parameters types.
Why not also allow
?
and&
accept anIterable
of pairs? That would be more in fitting with the dsl thanaddParams
.