Open tischi opened 3 years ago
What is the problem with this image? Apart that it has only 2 objects. I don't think this kind of data must come from a publication.
What is the problem with this image? Apart that it has only 2 objects. I don't think this kind of data must come from a publication.
That's the example image that I use in the module to explain, e.g., a median filter. I thought for the workflow we might like to have something else.
I think for the advanced workflow also something where we need a bit of object filtering, right?
It is incredible how much time it takes to find good example data with just the problem that you want ;-) I ended up "manufacturing" two images, by cropping and adding some noise to raw data that we acquired during a course.
The task would be to develop a workflow that automatically measures that the nuclei on the left are bigger than on the right.
Sorry I misunderstood the first question. I thought you wanted an additional image for just median filter explanation.
For the workflow shape measurement with filters this looks good. I realized that I have also more examples with PLK1 inhibition. I guess I also have to add some noise :-( .
In principlesite does not harm to provide several workflow example images.
The PLK1 difference is in the morphology and can be quite nicely shown with circularity.
In principle site does not harm to provide several workflow example images.
Yes, please go ahead and add more!
Hi both, If needed, we have a plate with fixed cells with PLK1 and KIF11 phenotypes (cells have a nuclear marker and labeled tubulin). I could take images in the condition you need for your teaching. All the best Sabine
@tischi, and @seadaisy, I uploaded PLK1 example images (xy_8bit__nuclei_PLK1_control, + inhibition). I think they are noisy enough that a simple threshold gives a rough boundary so either one needs raw image filtering or binary operations to clean up.
If @seadaisy wants to acquire some additional data it could be nice. For instance the KiF11 one could also look at the tubulin phenotype (intensity values). In principle one would need a 2D image (quite small 500-600 pixels) with not too many nuclei so that we can easily separate them. One can acquire images at different quality (one rather low but still visible and a good image in both channels). For an LSM for instance by reducing the line-averaging, laser-power, or detector gain. Thanks
Antonio
f @seadaisy wants to acquire some additional data it could be nice. For instance the KiF11 one could also look at the tubulin phenotype (intensity values). In principle one would need a 2D image (quite small 500-600 pixels) with not too many nuclei so that we can easily separate them. One can acquire images at different quality (one rather low but still visible and a good image in both channels). For an LSM for instance by reducing the line-averaging, laser-power, or detector gain. Thanks
Does it has to be a confocal image? If not, I can do it on a wide- field (very low light intensity should work). Sabine
Wide field is fine. They tend to be quite less noisy.
Dear All, unfortunately the plate I was talking about is not suitable anymore :( When ever we will have such a plate again, I will come back to you. Nonetheless I took images were always a pro-, or pro-meta-phase is in a field of view together with inter-phase nuclei with high and low exposure time (tubulin GFP and H2B mcherry) if this would be helpful, I could share the images. best Sabine
@imagejan @ssgpers @manerotoni @seadaisy What would be super nice if someone had images like the ones below but in 3D!
Shouldn't we maybe collect a "wish list" which data /datasets are needed and try to acquire them? We could then even store them, were the community has access to this data. It needs a bit of planning, but we have the microscopes, I could prepare the samples... What do you think?
Sabine
Shouldn't we maybe collect a "wish list" which data /datasets are needed and try to acquire them? We could then even store them, were the community has access to this data. It needs a bit of planning, but we have the microscopes, I could prepare the samples... What do you think?
❤️ Amazing! Thank you so much for offering this! I think @manerotoni also would have a chance to contribute. I started a google doc for this: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AkP1Vok5SOcj-eKAR397kpN2XlXXAAjBas8Odoke57I/edit?usp=sharing
@ssgpers @manerotoni @seadaisy
Do you happen have example images, which are:
Along the lines of something like this (ideally with a bit more objects and ideally some published data).