there are a couple of comments/ questions and solutions buried in the metadata table markdown.
It's not always a 100% clear to me, if those issues and comments have been resolved or are still work in progress.
I would suggest to create proper issues for each question/ comment instead of including these in the tables as mentioned here and then comment appropriately and resolving them in a clean fashion.
Hi,
there are a couple of comments/ questions and solutions buried in the metadata table markdown. It's not always a 100% clear to me, if those issues and comments have been resolved or are still work in progress. I would suggest to create proper issues for each question/ comment instead of including these in the tables as mentioned here and then comment appropriately and resolving them in a clean fashion.
https://github.com/NFDI4Microbiota/MetadataStandards/blob/70cbc79c36c1eff6e5d080b38a1dda02336bc130/Technical/Metagenome_Technical_Metadata.md?plain=1#L33
https://github.com/NFDI4Microbiota/MetadataStandards/blob/70cbc79c36c1eff6e5d080b38a1dda02336bc130/Technical/Metagenome_Technical_Metadata.md?plain=1#L34
Otherwise, I think it's confusing to include discussions in markdown files/ tables that are primarily supposed to be "reference tables".
@MartinBoleSlo and @cpauvert: What do you think/ what do you prefer, as you have been commenting and fixing the tables like this?