Looks good, but this pull request also contains changes from #42 which shouldn't be the case since if #42 would be declined, this one would need to be declined, too, even if the doc changes are fine. Will approve this one once #42 has been decided upon.
Looks good, but this pull request also contains changes from #42 which shouldn't be the case since if #42 would be declined, this one would need to be declined, too, even if the doc changes are fine. Will approve this one once #42 has been decided upon.