Closed ParsaArvanehPA closed 1 month ago
This preview will be available after the AzureCI is passed.
Hi guys @Laffery I think you meant to close and merge, instead you clicked close in this PR.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 93.15%. Comparing base (
2a972d3
) to head (bad806d
). Report is 5 commits behind head on master.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Hi guys @Laffery I think you meant to close and merge, instead you clicked close in this PR.
I dont know, I have no operations on this PR.
Please fix the CI issues first:)
Hi guys @Laffery I think you meant to close and merge, instead you clicked close in this PR.
I dont know, I have no operations on this PR. Please fix the CI issues first:)
The failed test is for the Image component, so I made this Pr for it. It seems to have fixed the problem... .
I had merged the fix PR for image compnent, please rebase this pr and trigger the CI againe
@ParsaArvanehPA It seems that the updating for tick
duration from 300 to 600 in image.spec.ts still not works :)
What about increasing it to 1000?
@ParsaArvanehPA It seems that the updating for
tick
duration from 300 to 600 in image.spec.ts still not works :) What about increasing it to 1000?
This behavior is kinda random. some of today's PRs are fixed and some aren't. Yeah let's get it up to 1000ms. I will first test it in this branch, if it works I will then create a new PR for it.
How about converting PLACEHOLDER to Data URL?
const PLACEHOLDER = `data:image/png;base64,...`
How about converting PLACEHOLDER to Data URL?
const PLACEHOLDER = `data:image/png;base64,...`
Could work 👍 made the change, waiting for the result
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information