Closed RebekkaML closed 3 months ago
@RebekkaML We need a mechanism for following up on these, so we don't forget. We can check these records once they have been through processing (we can rely on the specimen label and look at the image).
I looked at all of these specimens at Priorparken, the only one that needed to be corrected was Nr. 940736 which has to be Carduus crispus x nutans instead of Carduus crispus. I added this information in the infraspecies sheet.
With this, the outlier issue is resolved.
In the infraspecies spreadsheet (#91), there are some outliers (18 in total). These are specimen whose barcode numbers are not in consecutive order, so we don't know exactly which folder they are in, because we always only looked at the first and last number in each folder when filling out the infraspecies spreadsheet.
These barcodes were already identified, and now we need to look at them again and see if we can piece together where they come from. If the species only exists once and doesn't have any subspecies etc. we know it belongs in there as well, if there are subspecies we can't be sure and just leave it as it is.