Open cpmpercussion opened 4 years ago
Should we separate between URLs and DOIs, or just put DOIs into URL fields?
I think it's fine to have separate URL and doi fields, and to leave the url fields pointing to our archived version of the papers.
btw, I've revised the website to point to Zenodo as much as possible, hopefully that cuts down the bandwidth fees a bit 🙃
I see that there are currently extra fields for two of the years:
2015: Urlsuppl1 2016: Track
The track one from 2016 is not particularly useful, but the 2015 field should be changed to whatever we choose.
I have now added links to videos from 2011. Have used Presentation-video as the field name. Can easily be changed to something else, if needed.
Would it make sense to have a field for the submission type as well? Demo, short paper and long paper?
We can add extra fields to the bibtex file for storing links to external material such as videos, code, or posters.
So we should choose a few names and start adding them where videos are available: e.g., supplementary-video-url, talk-url, poster-url, code-url..
Then on the proceedings website, I can make a button for each extra field.