Open cpmpercussion opened 4 years ago
I don't have a strong opinion, but I agree that it makes sense to have a unique ID across the entire collection. So I think f"nime{year}{articleno}{first_author_last_name}" makes sense. Can you write a script to fix that?
Time to agree on a standard format for keys in the proceedings :-)
In the 2020 proc, the keys have the format:
f"NIME{year}_{articleno}"
In other years, I think @alexarje has standardised to:
f"{first_author_last_name}{year}"
I don't think the key matters too much, because people often change it anyway, but should we stick a "nime" or something in there so that the default key has the conference?
e.g., it could be
f"nime{year}_{first_author_last_name}"
or even
f"nime{year}_{articleno}_{first_author_last_name}"
The final option there, although a bit convoluted, would make every key unique even if one author had two papers in a certain edition.