Closed nicolevasilevsky closed 6 years ago
i'm not sure what's going on here, "has member" is not a part of my model...?
it is a subclass of 'has part' object property
didn't we exclude 'has part'?
Yes! But it looks like all the excluded properties are still showing up for some reason. Do we have to have those in the ontology? What if we just deleted them if they are not needed?
I think this has also been resolved with #15
In eagle-i, the 'has member' links to other person records in the repo. See screenshot of an example:
Should this be the case here too? Currently has member is free text: