Closed wtoorop closed 2 months ago
Patch looks reasonable. I tested it for my limited use case and it works as expected.
Are you planning to merge this any time soon?
Are you planning to merge this any time soon?
Yes, I will merge it with Wouter's recommendation to add the comment
I don't think you fully appreciate the seriousness of this issue...
I don't think you fully appreciate the seriousness of this issue...
To manage expections around this free, open-source project, I'd like to note that unlike projects with production-grade support such as NSD and Unbound, work on ldns
is done on a best-effort basis; for example in the context of a research project or an IETF Hackathon. We explicitly mention this in the development vision for the project.
To manage expections around this free, open-source project, [...]
You may want to consider your audience before you start handing out life lessons.
@AlexanderBand Just to make it clear: Your work on ldns is much appreciated.
I don't think you fully appreciate the seriousness of this issue...
To manage expections around this free, open-source project, I'd like to note that unlike projects with production-grade support such as NSD and Unbound, work on
ldns
is done on a best-effort basis; for example in the context of a research project or an IETF Hackathon. We explicitly mention this in the development vision for the project.
Maybe it would make sense to clarify the development vision, as the way it is currently written (quoting in full, emphasis is mine)
In principle we only perform basic maintenance and bug fixes on ldns, and will only consider development of new functionality on ad-hoc basis. This could for example be for a research project or an IETF Hackathon. We do not strive for ldns to be a comprehensive library that supports every (emerging) standard.
makes it sound (to me) like you would actually do bug fixes outside of research projects and IETF Hackathons. Using commented out parts of the configuration can have dire consequences, hence the sense of urgency.
Yes, we do bug fixes on ldns
. Still, we're managing many projects with very limited resources. In the context of all reposnsibilities, ldns
will not get the highest priority. I'm respectfully asking for your patience and understanding.
@wtoorop & @AlexanderBand Thank you!
Fixed issue #237