Closed ohsOllila closed 3 years ago
The focus of the manuscript is now updated and the results from the mixtures are moved to supplementary information. Therefore, I think that we should not go into this discussion in this manuscript (although this is an important point). Therefore, I close this issue.
Patrick Fuchs wrote (http://nmrlipids.blogspot.com/2017/03/nmrlipids-iv-headgroup-glycerol.html?showComment=1524839635875#c4712801836450464031):
This is interesting, but not exactly the core message of the manuscript. Maybe we should mention this very briefly? For example, we could just report the areas per lipid (without distinguishing PC and PE) and mention the difference between CHARMM36 and Berger. This as Todo point, currently in page 9.