The text in the SI states that with the scaled C36 calcium "The results with scaled charges are slightly improved" and with Na "show more significant order parameter decrease and higher Na+ binding affinity without NBFIX"
However, the actual figure shows that the data from the models is almost identical within the experimental error.
The text in the SI states that with the scaled C36 calcium "The results with scaled charges are slightly improved" and with Na "show more significant order parameter decrease and higher Na+ binding affinity without NBFIX"
However, the actual figure shows that the data from the models is almost identical within the experimental error.
If an erratum is written (eg. related to issue https://github.com/NMRLipids/lipid_ionINTERACTION/issues/60), these statements should be fixed too.