Open niclaurenti opened 5 months ago
The report has a fixed Q
all across for plotting (1.65 GeV, which is generally what we use) while the next-iteration-values (vp-nextfitruncard) are taken (correctly now xd) at Q0
.
Now... when you do this plot where both the values are relevant I'm not sure what the correct solution would be... Maybe we should just drop this plot when Q =/= Q0
since it would be inconsistent?
(you can always create the plot manually by doing a report where you have two namespaces, one with Q = 1.5 GeV
and another with Q = 1.65
GeV)
In the effective exponents part of the reports the plots are done taking the value at 1.65 GeV instead of Q0. This is relevant if someone wants to do a fit with Q0 different from 1.65.
For example in the plot in
https://vp.nnpdf.science/QgE-00fgTe2cnIK-3Pwo4g==/figures/exponents_report_current_basisfromfit_plot_alpha_eff_Sigma.pdf
the horizontal lines are plotted for Q=Q0 (i.e. 1.65 for the orange and 1.50 for the green lines), while the bands are plotted at Q=1.65 both for the green and orange one.