Closed felixhekhorn closed 1 year ago
since the original behaviour resulted into a failure I suggest to drop the pinecard for the moment completely and then do the proper job in #15
I would do the other way round...
How would you do it?
Provide directly the alternative, before dropping the current behavior. I do not want to obtain something that produces grids that are not reproducible, since it will make easier to postpone and forget the issue.
In other words: fix #15 first, then this issue. I agree with that.
Base: 29.61% // Head: 29.63% // Increases project coverage by +0.02%
:tada:
Coverage data is based on head (
d44b2b5
) compared to base (302568c
). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Closed in favor of #23
related to https://github.com/NNPDF/runcards/pull/159
since the original behaviour resulted into a failure I suggest to drop the pinecard for the moment completely and then do the proper job in https://github.com/NNPDF/pinefarm/issues/15