Data Name (This will be the displayed title in Catalog)
Relative condition
Indicator Name (as exists in ecodata)
condition
Family (Which group is this indicator associated with?)
[ ] Oceanographic
[ ] Habitat
[ ] Lower trophic levels
[X] Megafauna
[ ] Social
[ ] Economic
Data Description
NEFSC fall bottom trawl survey relative condition
Introduction to Indicator (Please explain your indicator)
The health and well being of individual fish can be related to body shape condition indices (i.e., weight at a given length) such as relative condition index, which is the ratio of observed weight to predicted weight based on length [@le_cren_length-weight_1951]. Heavier and fatter fish at a given length have higher relative condition which is expected to improve growth, reproductive output, and survival.
Le Cren’s [@le_cren_length-weight_1951] relative condition (Kn) is used in this study:
Kn = W/W’
Where W’ is the relative length-specific mean weight for the population in a given region. For this work, length-weight coefficients from Wigley et al. [@wigley_length-weight_2003] were used to calculate W’. Individual fish weights were total body weights from Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) fall bottom trawl surveys. Most finfish species included in this study are spring or summer spawners, so the fall survey was chosen to reduce variability of gonad weights in the spring survey as the fish ramp up for spawning.
Key Results and Visualization
MAB: Condition factor for fish species in the MAB based on fall NEFSC bottom trawl survey data. MAB data are missing for 2017 due to survey delays, and no survey was conducted in 2020.
A pattern of generally good condition was observed across many MAB species prior to 2000, followed by a period of generally poor condition from 2001-2010, with a mix of good and poor condition from 2011-2019. Condition was again mixed in 2023, but a number of species improved in condition from the relatively low condition in 2021
GOM and GB: Condition factor for fish species in the GOM and on GB based on fall NEFSC bottom trawl survey data. No survey was conducted in 2020.
A pattern of generally good condition was observed across many species in the GOM and GB regions prior to 2000, followed by a period of generally poor condition from 2001-2010, with a mix of good and poor condition from 2011-2019. Condition was again mixed in 2023, with many species in good condition on GB but a number of species with below avereage condition in the GOM
Preliminary General Additive Models show that for many species, temperature and copepod size structure have the strongest associations with relative fish condition. Directional trends show that some species are improving in condition with increases in water temperature, likely as a result of increased metabolic rates with sufficient food availability. Whereas other species are declining in condition with increases in water temperature, likely as a result of food limitations with increased metabolic rates, or reaching thermal temperature maxims and having to move into less productive areas in search of suitable thermal habitat. These species may be more susceptible to climate change. Preliminary change point analyses show that the decline in relative condition in the 2000s that is seen across many species aligns with a period dominated by large bodied copepods. Perretti et al. [@perretti_regime_2017] found similar periods of copepod size structure changes, and found that periods dominated by large bodied copepods were associated with low recruitment in groundfish. Relative fish condition is likely the mechanism for these linkages, where poor body condition leads to low fish recruitment.
Implications
These changes in condition have direct implications for stock assessments, catch quotas and management, and may indirectly impact fish recruitment and mortality.
Spatial Scale
The spatial scale for relative condition was on the EPU level.
Temporal Scale
The temporal scale for relative condition was the fall NEFSC bottom trawl survey (Sept.-Nov.).
Synthesis Theme
[X] Multiple System Drivers
[X] Regime Shifts
[ ] Ecosystem Reorganization
Define Variables
Species: common name for fish species
EPU: Ecological Production Unit
YEAR: year of condition data
MeanCond: annual mean by EPU and species of relative condition (unitless)
Primary Contact
Laurel.smith@noaa.gov
Secondary Contact
No response
Data Name (This will be the displayed title in Catalog)
Relative condition
Indicator Name (as exists in ecodata)
condition
Family (Which group is this indicator associated with?)
Data Description
NEFSC fall bottom trawl survey relative condition
Introduction to Indicator (Please explain your indicator)
The health and well being of individual fish can be related to body shape condition indices (i.e., weight at a given length) such as relative condition index, which is the ratio of observed weight to predicted weight based on length [@le_cren_length-weight_1951]. Heavier and fatter fish at a given length have higher relative condition which is expected to improve growth, reproductive output, and survival.
Le Cren’s [@le_cren_length-weight_1951] relative condition (Kn) is used in this study:
Kn = W/W’
Where W’ is the relative length-specific mean weight for the population in a given region. For this work, length-weight coefficients from Wigley et al. [@wigley_length-weight_2003] were used to calculate W’. Individual fish weights were total body weights from Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) fall bottom trawl surveys. Most finfish species included in this study are spring or summer spawners, so the fall survey was chosen to reduce variability of gonad weights in the spring survey as the fish ramp up for spawning.
Key Results and Visualization
MAB: Condition factor for fish species in the MAB based on fall NEFSC bottom trawl survey data. MAB data are missing for 2017 due to survey delays, and no survey was conducted in 2020.
A pattern of generally good condition was observed across many MAB species prior to 2000, followed by a period of generally poor condition from 2001-2010, with a mix of good and poor condition from 2011-2019. Condition was again mixed in 2023, but a number of species improved in condition from the relatively low condition in 2021
GOM and GB: Condition factor for fish species in the GOM and on GB based on fall NEFSC bottom trawl survey data. No survey was conducted in 2020.
A pattern of generally good condition was observed across many species in the GOM and GB regions prior to 2000, followed by a period of generally poor condition from 2001-2010, with a mix of good and poor condition from 2011-2019. Condition was again mixed in 2023, with many species in good condition on GB but a number of species with below avereage condition in the GOM
Preliminary General Additive Models show that for many species, temperature and copepod size structure have the strongest associations with relative fish condition. Directional trends show that some species are improving in condition with increases in water temperature, likely as a result of increased metabolic rates with sufficient food availability. Whereas other species are declining in condition with increases in water temperature, likely as a result of food limitations with increased metabolic rates, or reaching thermal temperature maxims and having to move into less productive areas in search of suitable thermal habitat. These species may be more susceptible to climate change. Preliminary change point analyses show that the decline in relative condition in the 2000s that is seen across many species aligns with a period dominated by large bodied copepods. Perretti et al. [@perretti_regime_2017] found similar periods of copepod size structure changes, and found that periods dominated by large bodied copepods were associated with low recruitment in groundfish. Relative fish condition is likely the mechanism for these linkages, where poor body condition leads to low fish recruitment.
Implications
These changes in condition have direct implications for stock assessments, catch quotas and management, and may indirectly impact fish recruitment and mortality.
Spatial Scale
The spatial scale for relative condition was on the EPU level.
Temporal Scale
The temporal scale for relative condition was the fall NEFSC bottom trawl survey (Sept.-Nov.).
Synthesis Theme
Define Variables
Species: common name for fish species
EPU: Ecological Production Unit YEAR: year of condition data MeanCond: annual mean by EPU and species of relative condition (unitless)
Indicator Category
If other, please specify indicator category
No response
Data Contributors
Laurel Smith
Point(s) of Contact
Laurel.smith@noaa.gov
Affiliation
NEFSC
Public Availability
Source data are publicly available.
Accessibility and Constraints
No response