Closed sgaichas closed 6 years ago
I've been thinking about this... I really like the travis-ci workflow (commit - push to branch - pull request - verify with travis-ci - merge to master if OK) because it prevents pushing a breaking change to the master that will prevent the book from building. This workflow works with GH pages, which would keep everything contained within the NOAA-EDAB/tech-memo repo.
I think this would be a (potentially) more complicated flavor of your slightly more complicated suggestion. I'm happy to help with any of the above, but won't have much time until next Thursday
That does look ideal; I'll see what I can set up. It would be great to let people look at the draft before or at the workshop on their own computers if possible, but if I can't swing it we can just show a local version on one of our machines.
I agree. Perhaps the travis-ci bit is not necessary for now but we can add later (or next iteration).
if I sign up with travis-ci it has an option for "grant access" to NOAA-EDAB organization; should I do that?
yeah, I think that's OK
It works! tech memo is live for future we may want to streamline the number of packages and dependencies--if one R package can work instead of several that would streamline build
Looks like we have two relatively easy options for posting a copy of the compiled tech memo for review: Rstudio Connect or GitHub GitHub looks slightly more complicated. I can enable the editing feature for the book either place. Thoughts?