NOAA-EMC / AQM

GNU General Public License v3.0
3 stars 16 forks source link

Three J-job scripts with AQMv7 #84

Open JianpingHuang-NOAA opened 1 year ago

JianpingHuang-NOAA commented 1 year ago

@MatthewPyle-NOAA @lgannoaa @chan-hoo

For operational implementation, the following three J-jobs are not used. Should we delete them?

https://github.com/ufs-community/ufs-srweather-app/blob/production/AQM.v7/jobs/JREGIONAL_MAKE_GRID https://github.com/ufs-community/ufs-srweather-app/blob/production/AQM.v7/jobs/JREGIONAL_MAKE_OROG https://github.com/ufs-community/ufs-srweather-app/blob/production/AQM.v7/jobs/JREGIONAL_MAKE_SFC_CLIMO

Thanks,

Jianping

MatthewPyle-NOAA commented 1 year ago

I would say yes, delete these unused J-jobs. (and associated ex-scripts).

lgannoaa commented 1 year ago

I agree with Matt. That is delete unused J-jobs and ex-scripts.

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 6:50 PM MatthewPyle-NOAA @.***> wrote:

I would say yes, delete these unused J-jobs. (and associated ex-scripts).

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/AQM/issues/84#issuecomment-1530067666, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI62YCMIQQQUSF2MHL5L3B3XEAAVVANCNFSM6AAAAAAXSBV6SM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

JianpingHuang-NOAA commented 1 year ago

@chan-hoo Please help us to delete them for aqmv7

JianpingHuang-NOAA commented 1 year ago

@MatthewPyle-NOAA @lgannoaa What about module files?

https://github.com/ufs-community/ufs-srweather-app/tree/production/AQM.v7/modulefiles

Should we keep wcoss2lua files only and delete the files for other machines?

Jianping

MatthewPyle-NOAA commented 1 year ago

I think non-WCOSS2 module files are okay to leave - NCO is more concerned about scripts and executables that aren't used.

lgannoaa commented 1 year ago

I think the module files is ok to leave. NCO prefer to use the latest module version. If the version used different between build and run please let Matt know. If there is a module must use older version please let Matt and I know.

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 3:56 PM MatthewPyle-NOAA @.***> wrote:

I think non-WCOSS2 module files are okay to leave - NCO is more concerned about scripts and executables that aren't used.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/AQM/issues/84#issuecomment-1530134325, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI62YCN4DZVHLT6EKR6K223XEAIO5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAXSBV6SM . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

chan-hoo commented 1 year ago

I've reopened this to UFS SRW App, Please open any issues on the workflow to UFS SRW App directly.