new bulk formula - Githubissues

NOAA-EMC / DATM-MOM6-CICE5

NEMS Coupled app with data ATM, MOM6 and CICE5

1 stars 9 forks source link

new bulk formula #38

Open hyunchul386 opened 3 years ago

hyunchul386 commented 3 years ago

Current bulk formula in NEMS mediator has been used for fluxes over the sea ice. For solving the SST increasing issue CFSR/GEFS fluxes with DATM-MOM6-CICE5, it is needed to use the bulk formula over the ocean as well as the ice.
The issue is that the current bulk formula is using surface wind velocities, temperature, and humidity as inputs and estimates 10 m height fields.
DATM_input of CFSR/GEFS have the 10m wind velocity, 2mT, and 2mQ, which can be used in the bulk formula
The new bulk formula module will use the DATM inputs directly, instead of the estimation, and be applied over the whole ocean and ice.

JessicaMeixner-NOAA commented 3 years ago

Out of curiosity, why are you using bulk over ice? Do you not have all the inputs the ice model is otherwise asking for?

hyunchul386 commented 3 years ago

Indeed, NEMS mediator has used bulk formula over the ice as default, I guess that the ice cover is different CFSR/GEFS from the DATM-MOM6-CICE5, which can induce lot of issues over the mismatch, and bulk formula over the sea ice would be reduce the issue.

DeniseWorthen commented 3 years ago

CICE obtains the height-lowest values from the atm and uses essentially the same formulas used in the mediator_methods to calculate the fluxes over the ice: ice_atmo.F90 #L72

hyunchul386 commented 3 years ago

I am checking the impacts of changes from the current bulk formula to the new bulk formula. In CFSR forcing there is big difference taux-45s

taux along 45S in 2011-10-01 from CFSR (green, 00Z), the new bulk form (black, 03Z) and the current bulk (red, 03Z). It is shown the the new bulk formula is more realistic than the current one.

hyunchul386 commented 3 years ago

In GEFS forcing, the current bulk formula and the new one show the similar pattern.

taux_45s_gefs taux along 45S in 2011-10-01 from GEFS (green, 00Z), the new bulk form (black, 03Z) and the current bulk (red, 03Z).

hyunchul386 commented 3 years ago

As shown, the taux of the current bulk formula from CFSR forcing is severely underestimated, but the one of the current bulk from GEFS forcing is comparable with one of new bulk formula.
The new bulk formula uses 10mU/V for calculation of wind stress. In the current bulk formula, the lowestlevel U/V are input from CFSR/GEFS, and 10mU/V are estimated from the lowestlevel U/V.
the lowestlevel U/V of GEFS and CFSR is different UGRD_HYBLEV1 along 45S in 2011-10-01 from GEFS (black) and CFSR (red)
the new bulk formula consistently provides realistic taux, and the current bulk formula has strong dependency of the lowest level data type, like CFSR.