Closed guillaumevernieres closed 3 months ago
One minor comment, that if I understand it properly should probably be instead
${PDY}${cyc}
that wouldn't work, the file written by soca has the iso date.
Automated Global-Workflow GDASApp Testing Results: Machine: hera
Start: Tue Apr 16 23:26:49 UTC 2024 on hfe06
---------------------------------------------------
Build: *SUCCESS*
Build: Completed at Wed Apr 17 00:17:02 UTC 2024
---------------------------------------------------
Tests: *Failed*
Tests: Failed at Wed Apr 17 00:35:17 UTC 2024
Tests: 91% tests passed, 5 tests failed out of 54
1763 - test_gdasapp_soca_JGDAS_GLOBAL_OCEAN_ANALYSIS_VRFY (Failed)
1766 - test_gdasapp_soca_ens_handler (Failed)
1776 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_run (Failed)
1777 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_inc (Failed)
1778 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_final (Failed)
Tests: see output at /scratch1/NCEPDEV/da/Cory.R.Martin/CI/GDASApp/workflow/PR/1050/global-workflow/sorc/gdas.cd/build/log.ctest
Automated Global-Workflow GDASApp Testing Results: Machine: orion
Start: Tue Apr 16 18:21:17 CDT 2024 on Orion-login-1.HPC.MsState.Edu
---------------------------------------------------
Build: *SUCCESS*
Build: Completed at Tue Apr 16 19:20:34 CDT 2024
---------------------------------------------------
Tests: *Failed*
Tests: Failed at Tue Apr 16 19:44:58 CDT 2024
Tests: 93% tests passed, 4 tests failed out of 54
1767 - test_gdasapp_soca_ens_handler (Failed)
1777 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_run (Failed)
1778 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_inc (Failed)
1779 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_final (Failed)
Tests: see output at /work2/noaa/stmp/cmartin/CI/GDASApp/workflow/PR/1050/global-workflow/sorc/gdas.cd/build/log.ctest
@guillaumevernieres the ensemble handler test fails, is that expected?
@guillaumevernieres the ensemble handler test fails, is that expected?
Not expected, I'll look into it.
Automated Global-Workflow GDASApp Testing Results: Machine: orion
Start: Wed Apr 17 13:30:59 CDT 2024 on Orion-login-1.HPC.MsState.Edu
---------------------------------------------------
Build: *SUCCESS*
Build: Completed at Wed Apr 17 14:23:32 CDT 2024
---------------------------------------------------
Tests: *Failed*
Tests: Failed at Wed Apr 17 14:45:07 CDT 2024
Tests: 94% tests passed, 3 tests failed out of 53
1776 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_run (Failed)
1777 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_inc (Failed)
1778 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_final (Failed)
Tests: see output at /work2/noaa/stmp/cmartin/CI/GDASApp/workflow/PR/1050/global-workflow/sorc/gdas.cd/build/log.ctest
Automated Global-Workflow GDASApp Testing Results: Machine: hera
Start: Wed Apr 17 18:30:37 UTC 2024 on hfe08
---------------------------------------------------
Build: *SUCCESS*
Build: Completed at Wed Apr 17 19:18:36 UTC 2024
---------------------------------------------------
Tests: *Failed*
Tests: Failed at Wed Apr 17 19:52:59 UTC 2024
Tests: 94% tests passed, 3 tests failed out of 53
1775 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_run (Failed)
1776 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_inc (Failed)
1777 - test_gdasapp_atm_jjob_var_final (Failed)
Tests: see output at /scratch1/NCEPDEV/da/Cory.R.Martin/CI/GDASApp/workflow/PR/1050/global-workflow/sorc/gdas.cd/build/log.ctest
What was done
StdDev
saber block with the above fields as a proxy of the background errorDO_HYBVAR
The results are reasonable but some of the parameters of the variance partitioning still need to be optimized further