Open climbfuji opened 3 years ago
This was completed with NOAA-GFDL:PR #75. This issue can be closed.
This is an old issue, according to the latest comment from Mar 29, 2021, this was completed at that time, but I think the two branches have deviated again?
@climbfuji There is an ongoing effort to merge GFDL master tp dev/emc.
@climbfuji the dev/emc in EMC repo is synced with the GFDL's dev/emc branch. Can this issue be closed? Thanks
@junwang-noaa This issue is about syncing dev/emc with master or main to avoid divergence between the different FV3 dycore branches, so I'd say no, it can't be closed.
@climbfuji - we are in the process of trying to update dev/emc. The main sticking point that keeps a simple merge from being cleanly accomplished is the whole atmosphere updates and how there were initially implemented within the dev/emc branch.
We need to make sure that EMC's dycore dev/emc branch stays close enough to GFDL's master branch so that updates can be synchronized.
Specific challenges that were discussed in a telecon in 01/13/2021 between @junwang-noaa, @XiaqiongZhou-NOAA, @bensonr, @DusanJovic-NOAA and @climbfuji:
atmosphere.F90
, which is host model specific (i.e. acts like a cap; GFDL has a different version of this file), thus the use of either IPD or GFS DDTs is no problemGFS_restart.F90
DDT is also used inexternal_ic.F90
, which we didn't discussnwat=4
used for Ferrier-Aligo in dev/emc, but used for Kessler in GFDL branches (with different condensate species)nwat
is currently hardcoded to match a specific set of condensate speciesnwat=2
andnwat=6
, we were "lucky" because all microphysics options with the samenwat
settings also had the same condensate speciesnwat=4
nwat
? Other options?Short-term actions: