GSI license - Githubissues

climbfuji commented 2 years ago

This project doesn't seem to have a license, can you add the correct one please?

RussTreadon-NOAA commented 11 months ago

The GSI Handling Review team is going through open GSI issues. May this issue be closed?

climbfuji commented 11 months ago

@RussTreadon-NOAA Does GSI have a license nowadays?

RussTreadon-NOAA commented 11 months ago

No, I am not aware of the GSI having a license. I am not aware of any plans for the GSI to obtain or add a license.

climbfuji commented 11 months ago

My recommendation would be to fix that. Here is the legal statement (from https://www.synopsys.com/blogs/software-security/unlicensed-open-source-scenarios.html#:~:text=This%20means%20that%20no%20one,permission%20to%20use%20the%20software.):

A license is a grant of rights. To use a piece of software, whether it’s open source or commercial, you need some grant of rights. In the U.S. and many other places, creative work (including software) is protected by exclusive copyright by default. This means that no one can legally use, copy, distribute, or modify that software without explicit permission from the creator/author. This permission comes in the form of a license that grants the right to do so. Without that license, the baseline assumption is that you do not have permission to use the software.

RussTreadon-NOAA commented 11 months ago

Thank you @climbfuji . Since we no longer have a GSI code manager, let me refer this to others in EMC for their consideration. To help me explain this request to other staff, why does GSI need a license? It's been around for years and is widely used by many. What impact does adding a license have on current users? What impact will it have on future users? Is there a standard template license used by codes accessible from NOAA-EMC?

climbfuji commented 11 months ago

I believe (but not 100% sure, not a legal expert) that the Federal Government / DOC / NOAA require any software that is developed to have an open source license that satisfies certain requirements. There's a lot of complicated legal language out there, check https://resources.data.gov/open-licenses. Most EMC software projects have a GNU Lesser General Public License 3.0 (LGPL) license, so I would go with that one unless that is not possible for GSI.

For spack-stack, for example, we had to go for a Creative Commons Zero license, since JCSDA cannot do LGPL3 (we can only do Creative Commons Zero and Apache2), but the Federal Government cannot do Apache2. It's complicated ...

climbfuji commented 11 months ago

But independent of all of that, having a software license is considered best practice because it gives users and developers clear guidelines on what they are supposed/allowed to do and what not.

RussTreadon-NOAA commented 11 months ago

Thank you @climbfuji for patiently explaining this to me. I reached out to EMC staff to see how to move forward in a manner consistent with EMC practice.