Closed CatherineThomas-NOAA closed 1 week ago
Hera ctest results
Test project /scratch1/NCEPDEV/da/Catherine.Thomas/gsi/feature_taper/build
Start 1: global_4denvar
Start 2: rtma
Start 5: hafs_3denvar_hybens
Start 4: hafs_4denvar_glbens
Start 6: global_enkf
Start 3: rrfs_3denvar_rdasens
1/6 Test #3: rrfs_3denvar_rdasens ............. Passed 1216.42 sec
2/6 Test #4: hafs_4denvar_glbens ..............***Failed 1880.73 sec
3/6 Test #6: global_enkf ...................... Passed 1950.77 sec
4/6 Test #1: global_4denvar ................... Passed 2568.77 sec
5/6 Test #5: hafs_3denvar_hybens .............. Passed 6740.22 sec
6/6 Test #2: rtma ............................. Passed 13935.89 sec
83% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 6
Total Test time (real) = 13935.93 sec
The following tests FAILED:
4 - hafs_4denvar_glbens (Failed)
The hafs_4denvar_glbens
test failed due to runtime:
The runtime for hafs_4denvar_glbens_loproc_updat is 297.647849 seconds. This has exceeded maximum allowable threshold time of 294.302768 seconds,
resulting in Failure time-thresh of the regression test.
A rerun of the hafs test succeeded:
Test project /scratch1/NCEPDEV/da/Catherine.Thomas/gsi/feature_taper/build
Start 4: hafs_4denvar_glbens
1/1 Test #4: hafs_4denvar_glbens .............. Passed 1408.14 sec
100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 1
Total Test time (real) = 1408.18 sec
I will run the tests on additional machines tomorrow.
@CatherineThomas-NOAA , who would you like to request two peer reviews from?
@TravisElless-NOAA and @AndrewEichmann-NOAA: Would you be available to review this PR?
From the Hera ctest global_enkf_hiproc_updat stdout:
TAPERANALPERTS = T,
TAPERANALPERTS_AKBOT = 500.000000000000 ,
TAPERANALPERTS_AKTOP = -1.00000000000000
For the effect of tapering itself, I usually use the spread netcdf files produced from the epos step. Using the data from the ctest, I tried to look at the differences between the increments of a couple members, but it's hard to tell if there's an effect there. The tapering does not set spread to zero at the model top, just reduces it.
For previous comparisons when taperanalperts
is turned on, see these slides
Dogwood ctests
Test project /lfs/h2/emc/da/noscrub/catherine.thomas/gsi/feature_taper/build
Start 1: global_4denvar
Start 2: rtma
Start 3: rrfs_3denvar_rdasens
Start 4: hafs_4denvar_glbens
Start 5: hafs_3denvar_hybens
Start 6: global_enkf
1/6 Test #3: rrfs_3denvar_rdasens ............. Passed 728.50 sec
2/6 Test #6: global_enkf ...................... Passed 852.35 sec
3/6 Test #2: rtma ............................. Passed 969.81 sec
4/6 Test #5: hafs_3denvar_hybens .............. Passed 1153.78 sec
5/6 Test #4: hafs_4denvar_glbens .............. Passed 1214.00 sec
6/6 Test #1: global_4denvar ................... Passed 1683.33 sec
100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 6
This PR can be scheduled for merger once we get a second approval from a peer reviewer.
@AndrewEichmann-NOAA , can you review this PR?
Description
The global_enkf ctest needs to be updated to include a change to the configuration of GFSv17. The upper layer ensemble spread is too large, so we are enabling a new feature in the EnKF to reduce the spread as part of the ensemble analysis. This feature was previously included in the GSI EnKF source code (Issue https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/GSI/issues/728) and being turned on in the global-workflow through https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/global-workflow/pull/3097. The g-w PR is not required to exercise this PR.
Fixes #806
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
The taperanalperts feature was tested in an ATM-only C384/C192 cycling parallel on Hera. The GSI regression tests were run on Hera (results in following comment).
Checklist