Closed AlysonStahl-NOAA closed 3 months ago
OK, this is a great PR. I hate warnings in the code, they just train us programmers to ignore (new) warnings. So the code can just keep getting worse and worse, if we don't fix all warnings and then demand a warning-free build in the CI.
But I'm a little worried about this PR, because our testing is not great (yet).
Can you submit a new PR with the code re-indent, and the unused variable warnings resolved? Those are the easy ones which we can be sure is not breaking anything.
Then, as a second pass, the code changes which remove parameters from the subroutine. That seems like a more serious edit and I would like to see that alone. Also we may wish to add more tests, and look at the code coverage report to make sure this code is being tested.
Closing this one. See #728
Fixes https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NCEPLIBS-grib_util/issues/128 Fixes https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NCEPLIBS-grib_util/issues/132