This is not something modern Linux distributions are good at. I commented it out and could build the library on Redhat 8 (which has a broken libgfortran.a, i.e. the packages that "provide" it just have symbolic links to a place where no version exists).
Is it really necessary to use static linking for this? Does anyone know? Thanks.
For release/public-v1: The following linker flags in NCEPLIBS-
grib_util/sorc/copygb2.fd/CMakeLists.txt
are requiring a static libgfortran:This is not something modern Linux distributions are good at. I commented it out and could build the library on Redhat 8 (which has a broken libgfortran.a, i.e. the packages that "provide" it just have symbolic links to a place where no version exists).
Is it really necessary to use static linking for this? Does anyone know? Thanks.