Closed uturuncoglu closed 2 years ago
I ran UFS-weather-model regression tests with this NEMS changes on Hera. All gnu passed. All intel passed except for control_atm_aerosols, which resulted in MPI_Abort. Tried it 4 times and all failed. Can any one try this test case on Hera and verify?
@MinsukJi-NOAA i am not sure but this could be an issue related with recently added GOCART chemistry component.
@MinsukJi-NOAA where is your RT run directory with the failed control_atm_aerosols test?
@MinsukJi-NOAA where is your RT run directory with the failed control_atm_aerosols test?
LOGDIR: /scratch2/NCEPDEV/stmp1/Minsuk.Ji/ufs-weather-model/tests/log_hera.intel
RUNDIR: /scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Minsuk.Ji/FV3_RT/rt_64975/control_atm_aerosols
The PET000 log shows PET000 module_EARTH_GRID_COMP.F90:453 Not valid - No component gocart found
. I think the branch needs to be updated w/ the current head of NEMS.
The PET000 log shows
PET000 module_EARTH_GRID_COMP.F90:453 Not valid - No component gocart found
. I think the branch needs to be updated w/ the current head of NEMS.
I think you are right. #102 was merged in after this PR was submitted.
Yes, there is no gocart in module_EARTH_GRID_COMP.F90. @uturuncoglu please merge with the latest nems develop branch.
[Jun.Wang@hfe11 src]$ grep -i "gocart" module_EARTH_GRID_COMP.F90 [Jun.Wang@hfe11 src]$
@junwang-noaa @MinsukJi-NOAA @DeniseWorthen @uturuncoglu, I have just synced this feature/hafs_couplehycom_cdeps branch with the latest develop branch.
control_atm_aerosols regression test passed. This PR is good for merge into UFS-weather-model @junwang-noaa @DeniseWorthen
@DeniseWorthen https://github.com/DeniseWorthen can we merge this PR with your ufs-weather-model PR #639?
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 9:05 AM Minsuk Ji @.***> wrote:
control_atm_aerosols regression test passed. This PR is good for merge into UFS-weather-model @junwang-noaa https://github.com/junwang-noaa @DeniseWorthen https://github.com/DeniseWorthen
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NEMS/pull/106#issuecomment-881433851, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TKEYGFAUPF2YZ5GPALTYAU7ZANCNFSM47RA5HOQ .
Yes that would be fine. I will switch my .gitmodules to point to the PR branch.
@BinLiu-NOAA #104 is expected to be merged in today. Please update the feature/hafs_couplehycom_cdeps branch once again after that since this PR is scheduled for early next week.
@BinLiu-NOAA #104 is expected to be merged in today. Please update the feature/hafs_couplehycom_cdeps branch once again after that since this PR is scheduled for early next week.
Will do. Thanks @MinsukJi-NOAA!
@BinLiu-NOAA Could you please update to the NEMS commit from today? Thanks.
@MinsukJi-NOAA @DeniseWorthen, have just synced with the latest develop branch as of this afternoon (07/16/2021). Thanks!
This PR aims to bring data ocean support to NEMS, which is related to the issue https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NEMS/issues/107. It also includes fix for reading modelio attributes from nems.configure and passing it to the CDEPS and CMEPS in case of it is defined.