Closed junwang-noaa closed 3 years ago
Thanks! This change has been overdue.
Dom, thanks for reviewing it. We need to test this branch for LAM and HAFS to confirm it works for high resolution runs before we run RT and commit the code.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 3:31 PM Dom Heinzeller notifications@github.com wrote:
@climbfuji approved this pull request.
I haven't tested it, but it looks ok to me.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NEMS/pull/81#pullrequestreview-493781863, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TOTBQXLGB2463LTW6DSHD3QZANCNFSM4RVGEJDQ .
@junwang-noaa, Is this PR ready for merge?
Minsuk,
I am running RT, it is supposed to be committed with ufs-weather-model PR
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:01 AM Minsuk Ji notifications@github.com wrote:
@junwang-noaa https://github.com/junwang-noaa, Is this PR ready for merge?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NEMS/pull/81#issuecomment-720562400, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TN2VKPKRZZVECKNCHLSN3JVFANCNFSM4RVGEJDQ .
Minsuk, All the RTs are done. You can merge the PR. Thanks
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:21 AM Jun Wang - NOAA Federal jun.wang@noaa.gov wrote:
Minsuk,
I am running RT, it is supposed to be committed with ufs-weather-model PR
206.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:01 AM Minsuk Ji notifications@github.com wrote:
@junwang-noaa https://github.com/junwang-noaa, Is this PR ready for merge?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NEMS/pull/81#issuecomment-720562400, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TN2VKPKRZZVECKNCHLSN3JVFANCNFSM4RVGEJDQ .
Set total forecast time to be real number to allow flexible forecast time
Related PRs:
fv3 PR #175 NEMS PR #81 ufs-weather-model PR #206