Closed aerorahul closed 2 days ago
FYI - My C48mx500 WCDA test succeeded with this branch: /scratch1/NCEPDEV/climate/Jessica.Meixner/tryagainocnpost/testciC48mx500wcda/
C384 test is not far enough along to check yet
I don't know what GH is checking for here
I copied the config.ufs
from JessicaMeixner-NOAA:feature/updatefillvalues
at ff74f8e6 to Hera /scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Russ.Treadon/EXPDIR/pr2700_wcda
. The 20210324 18Z gdasfcst was rewound and rebooted. The model failed in the same way it did before.
Do we need to back up the 20210324 12Z start of C48mx500_3DVarAOWCDA and rerun from the first half-cycle gdasfcst?
I copied the
config.ufs
fromJessicaMeixner-NOAA:feature/updatefillvalues
at ff74f8e to Hera/scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Russ.Treadon/EXPDIR/pr2700_wcda
. The 20210324 18Z gdasfcst was rewound and rebooted. The model failed in the same way it did before.Do we need to back up the 20210324 12Z start of C48mx500_3DVarAOWCDA and rerun from the first half-cycle gdasfcst?
@guillaumevernieres - can you confirm, but I'm thinking you will because this will effect output from the first gdas forecast half cycle.
I copied the
config.ufs
fromJessicaMeixner-NOAA:feature/updatefillvalues
at ff74f8e to Hera/scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Russ.Treadon/EXPDIR/pr2700_wcda
. The 20210324 18Z gdasfcst was rewound and rebooted. The model failed in the same way it did before. Do we need to back up the 20210324 12Z start of C48mx500_3DVarAOWCDA and rerun from the first half-cycle gdasfcst?@guillaumevernieres - can you confirm, but I'm thinking you will because this will effect output from the first gdas forecast half cycle.
We ran the WCDA-3DVAR-C48mx500
test with this reversion and got physical number back in the increments.
I copied the
config.ufs
fromJessicaMeixner-NOAA:feature/updatefillvalues
at ff74f8e to Hera/scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Russ.Treadon/EXPDIR/pr2700_wcda
. The 20210324 18Z gdasfcst was rewound and rebooted. The model failed in the same way it did before. Do we need to back up the 20210324 12Z start of C48mx500_3DVarAOWCDA and rerun from the first half-cycle gdasfcst?@guillaumevernieres - can you confirm, but I'm thinking you will because this will effect output from the first gdas forecast half cycle.
@RussTreadon-NOAA , you need to reboot the entire test, starting from the first 1/2 cycle.
Thank you @guillaumevernieres . I've done so and C48mx500_3DVarAOWCDA is almost back up to the 18Z gdasfcst.
Description
This PR:
RUN
.Type of change
Checklist