Open MatthewPyle-NOAA opened 7 months ago
More updates...sub hourly product (running total) all zero within first hour. Running total drops from 1:15 to 1:30 into forecast. Problematic time labels for all of the subhourly
wgrib2 -V rrfs.t06z.prslev.f000-15-00.conus.grib2 -match APCP
19:18445403:vt=2024041106:surface:15-15 min acc fcst:APCP Total Precipitation [kg/m^2]:
ndata=1905141:undef=0:**mean=0:min=0:max=0**
wgrib2 -V rrfs.t06z.prslev.f000-30-00.conus.grib2 -match APCP
19:18474763:vt=2024041106:surface:30-30 min acc fcst:APCP Total Precipitation [kg/m^2]:
ndata=1905141:undef=0:**mean=0:min=0:max=0**
wgrib2 -V rrfs.t06z.prslev.f000-45-00.conus.grib2 -match APCP
19:18543802:vt=2024041106:surface:45-45 min acc fcst:APCP Total Precipitation [kg/m^2]:
ndata=1905141:undef=0:**mean=0:min=0:max=0**
wgrib2 -V rrfs.t06z.prslev.f001.conus.grib2 -match APCP
758:643509165:vt=2024041107:surface:0-1 hour acc fcst:APCP Total Precipitation [kg/m^2]:
ndata=1905141:undef=0:mean=0.132625:min=0:max=98.5625
wgrib2 -V rrfs.t06z.prslev.f001-15-00.conus.grib2 -match APCP
19:18736740:vt=2024041107:surface:15-16 min acc fcst:APCP Total Precipitation [kg/m^2]:
ndata=1905141:undef=0:mean=0.134905:min=0:max=101.5
wgrib2 -V rrfs.t06z.prslev.f001-30-00.conus.grib2 -match APCP
19:18796085:vt=2024041107:surface:30-31 min acc fcst:APCP Total Precipitation [kg/m^2]:
ndata=1905141:undef=0:mean=0.136489:min=0:max=91.5
@MatthewPyle-NOAA thanks for the info. I see that we currently have these four 15-min acc variables in RRFS-A:
ASNOW APCP FRZR TSNOWP
Can you confirm we need all of these? Or do we just need APCP?
@EricJames-NOAA I'd say APCP is the only critical one - the others were on the "nice to have" pile, but I've been wondering if they should be trimmed. HRRR has these accumulation fields...probably why I included some winter weather fields:
26:25857641:d=2024050114:APCP:surface:1020-1035 min acc fcst: 27:26245238:d=2024050114:WEASD:surface:1020-1035 min acc fcst: 28:26313753:d=2024050114:FROZR:surface:1020-1035 min acc fcst:
@MatthewPyle-NOAA thanks. I'll include them for now, and we can decide to remove them later if we want.
@MatthewPyle-NOAA I have the UPP changes ready which are required to clean up the labeling. Should I open a PR, or wait until we have the final bucket values to finalize the 15-min fields? I guess there will be some minor UPP changes to pass through the correct bucket fields
@EricJames-NOAA Definitely open a UPP PR for this fix. That will motivate me to the finish the follow on work on a separate bucket code.
May post the same issue in the UPP repository.
The run time total (second APCP record) mostly seems to be okay (though the run total drops between f03 and f03:15), but is mislabeled in the 15 minute output. Maybe when we trim down the 15 minute product list, can eliminate this partial bucket record if remains problematic.